Criticism:
Many critics in literary circles see hypertext fiction and poetry as a "humorless digital postmodern joke" (Lillington 1) that assaults readers with floating neon fonts and crude literary strategies, if any literary skill is present at all.
They view hypertext as a threat to the overall integrity of literature because most anyone, without any training or editing, can post hypertext "poetry" or "fiction," even if their work does not include any traditional conventions. Proponents of hypertext literature argue that online texts are an original art form, which combines cinematic technique with live performance qualities, and is not designed to be viewed in the same light as printed literature (Lillington 1).
Hypertext has been a predictable mate for postmodern theorists, who believe in uncertainty and that texts are open to endless, shifting readings. The nature of hypertext embodies uncertainty by turning its back on traditional uses of point of view, voice and a sense of closure (Lillington 2). The postmodernists have been successful in establishing a connection between the new genre of hypertext and the accepted school of postmodern literary thought. An authoritative mark of their success was the recent inclusion of a J. Yellowlees Douglas’s hypertext work in the Norton Anthology of Postmodern American Fiction, a standard text in American literary courses (Lillington 2).